🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord designed to safeguard women from abuse, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters assembled in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final authority now rests with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, mandating governments to establish laws and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the process of exiting from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a move that rights groups described as a major setback for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its focus on equal rights undermines traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, lawmakers voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a move proposed by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the primary political groups supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent decision has provoked broad outcry both inside Latvia and abroad.

22,000 people have signed a national petition demanding the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey left the convention in 2021, instances of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds support, the president could potentially send back the bill for additional consideration if he holds objections.

Head of State the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would evaluate the decision according to legal requirements, "considering state and legal considerations, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in our nation but across Europe," commented a human rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been rising in several European countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could influence similar debates in other EU countries