🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 remains arguably the most deadly – and significant – occasions throughout multiple decades of violence in the region.

Within the community of the incident – the legacy of the tragic events are displayed on the buildings and embedded in public consciousness.

A protest demonstration was held on a chilly yet clear period in the city.

The protest was a protest against the system of imprisonment without charges – detaining individuals without legal proceedings – which had been put in place following three years of unrest.

Soldiers from the specialized division shot dead thirteen individuals in the neighborhood – which was, and remains, a predominantly nationalist area.

A specific visual became especially memorable.

Images showed a Catholic priest, Fr Edward Daly, waving a stained with blood fabric while attempting to protect a assembly moving a teenager, the fatally wounded individual, who had been killed.

News camera operators recorded considerable film on the day.

Documented accounts features the priest explaining to a journalist that troops "just seemed to fire in all directions" and he was "absolutely certain" that there was no provocation for the discharge of weapons.

The narrative of events was rejected by the first inquiry.

The Widgery Tribunal found the soldiers had been shot at first.

During the resolution efforts, the administration established a fresh examination, following pressure by family members, who said the initial inquiry had been a cover-up.

That year, the conclusion by the investigation said that overall, the soldiers had initiated shooting and that not one of the victims had been armed.

The then Prime Minister, David Cameron, expressed regret in the Parliament – declaring deaths were "unjustified and unjustifiable."

Law enforcement commenced examine the incident.

One former paratrooper, known as the accused, was brought to trial for murder.

Indictments were filed over the deaths of one victim, in his twenties, and twenty-six-year-old William McKinney.

Soldier F was also accused of trying to kill several people, Joseph Friel, more people, another person, and an unnamed civilian.

There is a legal order preserving the veteran's anonymity, which his lawyers have maintained is essential because he is at danger.

He testified the investigation that he had only fired at persons who were carrying weapons.

That claim was dismissed in the official findings.

Information from the investigation was unable to be used immediately as evidence in the criminal process.

In court, the veteran was hidden from public behind a blue curtain.

He made statements for the initial occasion in the proceedings at a proceeding in that month, to answer "innocent" when the allegations were read.

Relatives of those who were killed on that day travelled from the city to the judicial building every day of the trial.

A family member, whose relative was fatally wounded, said they understood that hearing the trial would be painful.

"I visualize all details in my memory," the relative said, as we visited the main locations referenced in the case – from Rossville Street, where Michael was shot dead, to the adjoining the area, where the individual and the second person were killed.

"It reminds me to my location that day.

"I assisted with the victim and put him in the vehicle.

"I experienced again every moment during the testimony.

"Notwithstanding experiencing all that – it's still meaningful for me."